Several Liberians from across the political and civic spectrum are expressing outrage following a controversial statement made by Sekou Kalasco, former special aide to ex-President George Weah, who rated the administration of President Joseph Nyuma Boakai a mere four out of ten. The remark, delivered during a live appearance on the Liberian Broadcasting System’s flagship program the Super Morning Show hosted by Varflee Kamara has ignited fierce public debate and drawn widespread condemnation. Kalasco’s assessment, which he offered without presenting a clear evaluative framework or comparative data, was perceived by many as politically motivated and dismissive of the Boakai administration’s early efforts to stabilize governance and initiate reforms.
His critique focused on what he described as poor economic performance, weak youth engagement, and inadequate responses to the country’s drug crisis. However, listeners and viewers quickly took to social media and community platforms to challenge the credibility and timing of his remarks. Many Liberians pointed out that President Boakai inherited a fragile economy, a demoralized civil service, and a public sector riddled with allegations of corruption and mismanagement issues widely associated with the Weah administration in which Kalasco served. Critics argue that Boakai’s government, though not without challenges, has made visible strides in restoring diplomatic credibility, launching education reform through the EXCEL Project, and initiating community-based anti-drug campaigns.
The backlash was swift and intense. University students, civil society leaders, and faith-based advocates described Kalasco’s rating as reckless and unpatriotic, especially given the platform on which it was delivered. The Liberian Broadcasting System, as the state broadcaster, is viewed by many as a national institution that should foster constructive dialogue and informed critique. Kalasco’s use of the Super Morning Show to deliver what some called a “partisan jab” has raised questions about the politicization of public media spaces. Political analysts have weighed in, suggesting that Kalasco’s statement may be part of a broader post-election strategy aimed at discrediting the Boakai administration ahead of midterm evaluations.
Some see it as an attempt to remain politically relevant by shaping public perception through provocative commentary. Others argue that such tactics reflect a deeper unwillingness among former officials to acknowledge the systemic challenges they left behind. In Monrovia and beyond, citizens are calling for a shift in political discourse one that prioritizes facts, fairness, and national unity over scorecards and soundbites. A resident of Sinkor, reacting to the broadcast, remarked, “If you’re going to grade the government, show your rubric.
What did you do better? Liberia needs solutions, not scorecards.” The Super Morning Show episode has since become a flashpoint for national debate, with many Liberians demanding that future media appearances by political figures be grounded in evidence and guided by a shared commitment to progress. As the Boakai administration continues to navigate post-election recovery and institutional reform, the public’s response to Kalasco’s remarks underscores a growing demand for accountability not just from those in power, but also from those who once held it.
