Key prosecution Witness Links Amos Koffa and Dixon Seebo to Capitol Arson Plot in Ongoing Court Testimony

A key witness in the ongoing Capitol Building arson trial delivered explosive testimony on Wednesday, linking Amos Koffa, Dixon Seebo, and several others to a conspiracy to attack the Capitol in December 2024. The proceedings, held during the 26th Day Jury Sitting of the November Term of Court, revolved around a controversial audio recording allegedly containing evidence of the plot. 

Defense counsel objected, arguing that the witness was not qualified in voice identification and that the audio evidence constituted hearsay. They cited a statement from the Liberia National Police’s chief investigator, who admitted he was not a specialist in voice analysis. However, the Court overruled the objection, ruling that the witness could testify based on his involvement in the investigation and the validation of the audio through official channels, including the National Security Agency. 

The Court emphasized that although the chain of custody was questioned, the content of the recording was deemed relevant and admissible. During the cross-examination phase, the defense team raised concerns about a Special Investigation Report submitted by the state, claiming it was introduced late and not disclosed during the discovery process. The defense prayed the court to allow photocopying of the document so it could be reviewed and discussed with their clients for proper cross-examination. 

They emphasized that the request was made in good faith and was essential for a fair trial and full understanding of the allegations. The court was informed by the defense team that the witness was not an expert in voice analysis, but rather a criminal investigator, thus lacking qualification to identify voices heard in the recording. The defense rested its argument on the claim that the instrument (recording) lacked credibility and should not be admitted. 

The court did not make a final ruling on the admissibility at that moment but noted the defense’s exceptions. Legal Analysis: Evidence Under Scrutiny This session of the trial highlights a fundamental tension in criminal proceedings: the admissibility of electronic evidence without a clear chain of custody or expert authentication. Liberian law, like many common law systems, requires that evidence especially electronic media must be authenticated and its origin clearly traced to ensure it has not been tampered with or misrepresented.

Author: Melvin Jackson